RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01103
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2X, which denotes 1st
term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment, be changed.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was forced out under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback
program. It was not optional for him.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 Jun 08, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.
On 11 Nov 11, his supervisor notified him he was referring his
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period 11 Nov 10-10 Nov
11, per AFI 36-2406, Military Performance Evaluations, paragraph
3.9., for failing to meet minimum fitness standards. He
acknowledged receipt that day indicating he did not intend to
provide comments.
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular
Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending
him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple
disciplinary issues. The applicant acknowledged it the same day.
On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058,
Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he
intended to place him on the control roster for his duty
performance and multiple disciplinary issues. Attachments to the
form were two Letters of Counseling (LOCs), dated 30 May 11 and 4
Jan 12; and one Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 27 Sep 10.
On 17 May 12, he acknowledged the notification of the UIF
indicating he did not intend to submit a written statement.
On 18 May 12, his supervisor decided to place him on the control
roster.
On 30 May 12, he indicated he did not intend to appeal the
decision. Section V of the AF Form 418, indicated the applicants
reenlistment eligibility code should be updated from 4I denoting
serving on control roster to 2X.
On 29 Sep 12, the applicant received an honorable discharge. He
was credited with 4 years, 3 months and 27 days of active service.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The RE code received is correct.
The applicant was discharged on 29 Sep 12 under the FY12 AF Force
Shaping Rollback Program.
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, states
commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection
authority. The SRP considers the members EPR ratings, UIF from
any substantiated source, the airmans willingness to comply with
Air Force standards and/or the airmans ability (or lack of) to
meet required training and duty performance levels. The applicant
does not try to provide any proof of an error or injustice in
reference to his RE code, but states he was discharged with an
honorable character of service. Per the applicants AF IMT 1058,
section II, block 8 (that was attached to his AF Form 418,the
applicant had two LOCs and an LOR.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He is not arguing the validity of the code but wants an
opportunity to prove himself in the Air Force. He is now more
responsible. He was not using the core values, Integrity first,
Service before self and Excellence in all I do. He realizes
these are only words and wants the chance to prove he can be an
outstanding airman.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01103 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Mar 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 Apr 14.
Exhibit D. Applicants response, undated.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01474
On 3 Jul 12, AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide the documents she contends were added to her appeal package without due process. On 24 Jul 12, in response to DPSOA’s request, she stated after submitting her appeal package to the Force Support Squadron, she inquired about the status and was informed her unit had provided additional documentation (i.e. LOC, dated 7 Sep 11, LOC, dated 3 Nov 11, and a LOR, dated 2 Mar 12) to legal for their recommendation to the group commander. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05025
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster action had already expired. On the same date, the applicants commander non- selected her for reenlistment. On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second- term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) based on her...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00033
The applicant contends that none of the evaluators were members of the Air Force. In accordance with AFR 39-62, Noncommissioned Officer and Airman Performance Reports, when none of the evaluators are Air Force personnel, an Air Force advisor must sign the report. Even if the reasons for the delay in filing are insufficient to excuse the delay, we may examine the facts and circumstances of the case and, if substantial evidence of error or injustice exists, waive the three year time limit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.